Iraq vs Jamaica: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Iraq
- Jamaica
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 634 t against 536.9 t in Jamaica, a difference of 97.1 t.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 150th and Jamaica ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,578 t | 2,115 t | 2,463 t | Iraq |
| 1970s | 4,713 t | 2,171 t | 2,541 t | Iraq |
| 1980s | 3,829 t | 1,956 t | 1,873 t | Iraq |
| 1990s | 7,776 t | 1,861 t | 5,915 t | Iraq |
| 2000s | 9,151 t | 1,279 t | 7,872 t | Iraq |
| 2010s | 2,605 t | 1,051 t | 1,554 t | Iraq |
| 2020s | 2,014 t | 592.34 t | 1,421 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Iraq or Jamaica?
- Iraq, at 634 t against 536.9 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Iraq and Jamaica?
- 97.1 t, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Jamaica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Jamaica rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Iraq ranks 150th and Jamaica ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).