Jamaica vs Jordan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jamaica
- Jordan
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 536.9 t against 505.34 t in Jordan, a difference of 31.56 t.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 151st and Jordan ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 6 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,115 t | 2,492 t | 377.5 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 2,171 t | 1,506 t | 665.1 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 1,956 t | 752.82 t | 1,203 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 1,861 t | 461.63 t | 1,400 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 1,279 t | 274.05 t | 1,005 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,051 t | 312.95 t | 737.92 t | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 592.34 t | 338.05 t | 254.3 t | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Jamaica or Jordan?
- Jamaica, at 536.9 t against 505.34 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Jamaica and Jordan?
- 31.56 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Jordan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Jamaica ranks 151st and Jordan ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).