Japan vs Kazakhstan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Japan
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 62,752 t against 61,989 t in Japan, a difference of 763 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 53rd and Kazakhstan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69,384 t | 8,677 t | 60,707 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 67,660 t | 10,960 t | 56,700 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 63,627 t | 38,683 t | 24,944 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 61,866 t | 51,528 t | 10,338 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Japan or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 62,752 t against 61,989 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Japan and Kazakhstan?
- 763 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Kazakhstan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Japan ranks 53rd and Kazakhstan ranks 52nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).