Jordan vs Solomon Islands: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jordan
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 527.28 t against 505.34 t in Jordan, a difference of 21.94 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 153rd and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 4 and Solomon Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,492 t | 102.42 t | 2,390 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 1,506 t | 148.84 t | 1,357 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 752.82 t | 202.75 t | 550.08 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 461.63 t | 220.97 t | 240.66 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 274.05 t | 316 t | 41.95 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 312.95 t | 494.46 t | 181.51 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 338.05 t | 527.29 t | 189.24 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Jordan or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 527.28 t against 505.34 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Jordan and Solomon Islands?
- 21.94 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Solomon Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Solomon Islands rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Jordan ranks 153rd and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).