Kazakhstan vs Poland: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 62,752 t against 61,705 t in Poland, a difference of 1,047 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Poland ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 52nd and Poland ranks 54th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,677 t | 19,378 t | 10,701 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 10,960 t | 15,028 t | 4,067 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 38,683 t | 36,127 t | 2,556 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 51,528 t | 55,934 t | 4,406 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Poland?
- Kazakhstan, at 62,752 t against 61,705 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Poland?
- 1,047 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Poland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Poland rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 52nd and Poland ranks 54th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).