Kenya vs Mexico: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kenya
- Mexico
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 98,850 t against 92,949 t in Mexico, a difference of 5,901 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Kenya ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 36th of 191 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,813 t | 97,816 t | 70,003 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 37,280 t | 131,081 t | 93,801 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 42,687 t | 156,949 t | 114,263 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 53,965 t | 139,029 t | 85,064 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 49,434 t | 114,762 t | 65,328 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 76,383 t | 129,953 t | 53,570 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 84,915 t | 116,806 t | 31,891 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Kenya or Mexico?
- Kenya, at 98,850 t against 92,949 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Kenya and Mexico?
- 5,901 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Kenya ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).