Kenya vs Republic of Moldova: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kenya
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 98,850 t against 4,881 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 93,969 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 20.3 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 30th and Republic of Moldova ranks 15th of 176 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 51,693 t | 5,170 t | 46,523 t | Kenya |
| 2000s | 49,434 t | 5,228 t | 44,207 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 76,383 t | 6,547 t | 69,836 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 84,915 t | 4,457 t | 80,458 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Kenya or Republic of Moldova?
- Kenya, at 98,850 t against 4,881 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Kenya and Republic of Moldova?
- 93,969 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Republic of Moldova rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Kenya ranks 30th and Republic of Moldova ranks 15th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).