Lesotho vs Slovenia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lesotho
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 462.76 t against 432.19 t in Lesotho, a difference of 30.57 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 156th and Slovenia ranks 155th of 191 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 565.99 t | 58 t | 508 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 570.42 t | 204.36 t | 366.07 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 394.09 t | 283.25 t | 110.84 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 514.77 t | 375.76 t | 139 t | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Lesotho or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 462.76 t against 432.19 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Lesotho and Slovenia?
- 30.57 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Slovenia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Lesotho ranks 156th and Slovenia ranks 155th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).