Libya vs Suriname: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Libya
- Suriname
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1,509 t against 1,306 t in Suriname, a difference of 203 t.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 133rd and Suriname ranks 136th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,004 t | 897.48 t | 106.2 t | Libya |
| 1970s | 1,364 t | 1,262 t | 101.49 t | Libya |
| 1980s | 1,783 t | 1,895 t | 112.01 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 2,202 t | 1,546 t | 656.79 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 2,160 t | 1,249 t | 910.43 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 1,632 t | 1,532 t | 100.54 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 1,600 t | 1,393 t | 206.7 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Libya or Suriname?
- Libya, at 1,509 t against 1,306 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Libya and Suriname?
- 203 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Suriname rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Libya ranks 133rd and Suriname ranks 136th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).