Lithuania vs Nicaragua: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lithuania
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 25,432 t against 24,202 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 1,230 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Lithuania ranks 74th and Nicaragua ranks 75th of 191 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,690 t | 11,419 t | 6,729 t | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 4,195 t | 20,023 t | 15,829 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 17,088 t | 22,957 t | 5,869 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 24,156 t | 25,033 t | 877.55 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Nicaragua?
- Lithuania, at 25,432 t against 24,202 t in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Nicaragua?
- 1,230 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Nicaragua rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Lithuania ranks 74th and Nicaragua ranks 75th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).