Lithuania vs Peru: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen

Lithuania
25,432 t
in 2023
Peru
29,491 t
in 2023
Lithuania rank
74th
Peru rank
71st

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Lithuania
  • Peru
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 29,491 t against 25,432 t in Lithuania, a difference of 4,059 t.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Peru ahead.

Lithuania ranks 74th and Peru ranks 71st of 191 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 4,690 t 16,214 t 11,524 t Peru
2000s 4,195 t 23,686 t 19,491 t Peru
2010s 17,088 t 28,683 t 11,595 t Peru
2020s 24,156 t 29,441 t 5,286 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Peru?
Peru, at 29,491 t against 25,432 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Peru?
4,059 t, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Peru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Peru rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
Lithuania ranks 74th and Peru ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).