Lithuania vs South Sudan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lithuania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 25,432 t against 24,051 t in South Sudan, a difference of 1,381 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Lithuania ranks 74th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20,083 t | 15,446 t | 4,637 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 24,156 t | 23,415 t | 740.77 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or South Sudan?
- Lithuania, at 25,432 t against 24,051 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 1,381 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and South Sudan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Lithuania ranks 74th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).