Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.10 million t
in 2023
Myanmar
533,961 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th
Myanmar rank
10th

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 3.10 million t against 533,961 t in Myanmar, a difference of 2.57 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 5.8 times Myanmar's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Myanmar ranks 10th of 29 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 1.01 million t 183,332 t 827,990 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 1.21 million t 195,951 t 1.01 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 1.25 million t 202,708 t 1.05 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 1.38 million t 263,823 t 1.12 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 1.72 million t 500,772 t 1.21 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2.52 million t 599,902 t 1.92 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 3.02 million t 544,301 t 2.47 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 3.10 million t against 533,961 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
2.57 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and Myanmar ranks 10th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).