Luxembourg vs Puerto Rico: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Luxembourg
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 67.21 t against 43.06 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 24.15 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.6 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 157th and Puerto Rico ranks 160th of 176 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.11 t | 61.21 t | 29.9 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 68.71 t | 45.55 t | 23.16 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 72.14 t | 40.32 t | 31.82 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Luxembourg or Puerto Rico?
- Luxembourg, at 67.21 t against 43.06 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 24.15 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Puerto Rico rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Luxembourg ranks 157th and Puerto Rico ranks 160th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).