Malawi vs Sudan (former): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malawi
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 153,007 t against 150,540 t in Malawi, a difference of 2,467 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Malawi ranks 25th and Sudan (former) ranks 24th of 191 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31,698 t | 37,037 t | 5,339 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 39,404 t | 74,619 t | 35,215 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 36,486 t | 61,838 t | 25,352 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 30,794 t | 82,654 t | 51,860 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 59,886 t | 104,096 t | 44,211 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 91,018 t | 130,851 t | 39,834 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Malawi or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 153,007 t against 150,540 t in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Malawi and Sudan (former)?
- 2,467 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Sudan (former) rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Malawi ranks 25th and Sudan (former) ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).