Mauritius vs Switzerland: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mauritius
- Switzerland
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 918.41 t against 900.29 t in Switzerland, a difference of 18.12 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 144th and Switzerland ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,064 t | 0 t | 2,064 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 2,081 t | 113.47 t | 1,968 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 2,056 t | 205.02 t | 1,851 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1,899 t | 800.77 t | 1,098 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,731 t | 1,133 t | 598.05 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1,329 t | 1,105 t | 224.74 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1,025 t | 1,032 t | 6.4 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Mauritius or Switzerland?
- Mauritius, at 918.41 t against 900.29 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Mauritius and Switzerland?
- 18.12 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Switzerland rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Mauritius ranks 144th and Switzerland ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).