Melanesia vs Sudan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Melanesia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 232,963 t against 2,607 t in Melanesia, a difference of 230,356 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 89.3 times Melanesia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 19th of 18 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,739 t | 207,514 t | 204,775 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 2,695 t | 280,598 t | 277,902 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Melanesia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 232,963 t against 2,607 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Melanesia and Sudan?
- 230,356 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Sudan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Melanesia ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 19th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).