Mongolia vs Tonga: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mongolia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 149.71 t against 108.06 t in Mongolia, a difference of 41.65 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.4 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 167th and Tonga ranks 164th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 149.63 t | 78.05 t | 71.58 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 118.73 t | 96.94 t | 21.78 t | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 122.87 t | 132.28 t | 9.41 t | Tonga |
| 1990s | 121.16 t | 115.71 t | 5.46 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 95.48 t | 101.75 t | 6.27 t | Tonga |
| 2010s | 107.88 t | 146.44 t | 38.56 t | Tonga |
| 2020s | 107.44 t | 149.7 t | 42.25 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Mongolia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 149.71 t against 108.06 t in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Mongolia and Tonga?
- 41.65 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Tonga rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Mongolia ranks 167th and Tonga ranks 164th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).