Mozambique vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen

Mozambique
111,805 t
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS)
71,775 t
in 2023
Mozambique rank
30th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
31st

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Mozambique
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 111,805 t against 71,775 t in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 40,030 t.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.6 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.

Mozambique ranks 30th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 31st of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Small island developing States (SIDS) in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
1960s 29,207 t 80,397 t 51,190 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1970s 33,317 t 89,145 t 55,828 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1980s 35,115 t 92,564 t 57,448 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
1990s 35,110 t 84,076 t 48,967 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2000s 49,246 t 73,937 t 24,691 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2010s 71,274 t 85,667 t 14,393 t Small island developing States (SIDS)
2020s 86,657 t 74,358 t 12,299 t Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Mozambique or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Mozambique, at 111,805 t against 71,775 t in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Mozambique and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
40,030 t, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
Mozambique ranks 30th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 31st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen/mozambique/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen/mozambique/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Mozambique vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).