Myanmar vs USSR: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Myanmar
- USSR
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 533,961 t against 466,300 t in USSR, a difference of 67,661 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times USSR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 10th and USSR ranks 11th of 191 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 183,332 t | 577,150 t | 393,818 t | USSR |
| 1970s | 195,951 t | 549,174 t | 353,223 t | USSR |
| 1980s | 202,708 t | 605,015 t | 402,307 t | USSR |
| 1990s | 199,664 t | 573,582 t | 373,919 t | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Myanmar or USSR?
- Myanmar, at 533,961 t against 466,300 t in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Myanmar and USSR?
- 67,661 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Myanmar and USSR rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Myanmar ranks 10th and USSR ranks 11th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).