New Zealand vs Suriname: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- New Zealand
- Suriname
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1,482 t against 1,306 t in Suriname, a difference of 176 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 124th of 176 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,903 t | 897.48 t | 1,006 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 3,282 t | 1,262 t | 2,020 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 4,167 t | 1,895 t | 2,272 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 3,622 t | 1,546 t | 2,076 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 1,916 t | 1,249 t | 666.49 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1,636 t | 1,532 t | 103.82 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1,482 t | 1,393 t | 89.24 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, New Zealand or Suriname?
- New Zealand, at 1,482 t against 1,306 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between New Zealand and Suriname?
- 176 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Suriname rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- New Zealand ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 124th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).