Nicaragua vs Romania: Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Nicaragua
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 28,126 t against 24,202 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 3,924 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 75th and Romania ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,642 t | 23,469 t | 19,827 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 4,399 t | 30,104 t | 25,705 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 6,029 t | 41,902 t | 35,872 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 10,642 t | 14,256 t | 3,615 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 20,023 t | 13,830 t | 6,194 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 22,957 t | 21,504 t | 1,453 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 25,033 t | 27,209 t | 2,176 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation β cropland nitrogen, Nicaragua or Romania?
- Romania, at 28,126 t against 24,202 t in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation β cropland nitrogen between Nicaragua and Romania?
- 3,924 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Romania rank globally for biological fixation β cropland nitrogen?
- Nicaragua ranks 75th and Romania ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).