Oceania vs Sudan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Oceania
- Sudan
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 377,808 t against 232,963 t in Sudan, a difference of 144,845 t.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.6 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Oceania ahead.
Oceania ranks 21st and Sudan ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 234,253 t | 207,514 t | 26,738 t | Oceania |
| 2020s | 291,311 t | 280,598 t | 10,714 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Oceania or Sudan?
- Oceania, at 377,808 t against 232,963 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Oceania and Sudan?
- 144,845 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Sudan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Oceania ranks 21st and Sudan ranks 20th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).