Oman vs Saint Lucia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Oman
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Oman currently reports 6.42 t against 3.21 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 3.21 t.
That makes Oman's figure about 2.0 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Oman ranks 180th and Saint Lucia ranks 181st of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 8.39 t | 8.39 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 0 t | 2.63 t | 2.63 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 0 t | 3.26 t | 3.26 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 0 t | 3.22 t | 3.22 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 0.8475 t | 3.18 t | 2.33 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 2.9 t | 3.24 t | 0.3418 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 4.92 t | 3.2 t | 1.72 t | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Oman or Saint Lucia?
- Oman, at 6.42 t against 3.21 t in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Oman and Saint Lucia?
- 3.21 t, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Saint Lucia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Oman ranks 180th and Saint Lucia ranks 181st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).