Paraguay vs Russian Federation: Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Paraguay
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 690,363 t against 682,008 t in Paraguay, a difference of 8,355 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Paraguay ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 158,689 t | 176,949 t | 18,260 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 315,703 t | 157,754 t | 157,950 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 596,223 t | 361,925 t | 234,297 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 643,117 t | 598,991 t | 44,126 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation β cropland nitrogen, Paraguay or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 690,363 t against 682,008 t in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation β cropland nitrogen between Paraguay and Russian Federation?
- 8,355 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Paraguay and Russian Federation rank globally for biological fixation β cropland nitrogen?
- Paraguay ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).