Paraguay vs Viet Nam: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Paraguay
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 682,008 t against 228,001 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 454,007 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 3.0 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Paraguay ranks 8th and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 176 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,084 t | 137,504 t | 132,420 t | Viet Nam |
| 1970s | 26,912 t | 146,703 t | 119,791 t | Viet Nam |
| 1980s | 94,584 t | 181,557 t | 86,973 t | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | 150,708 t | 225,719 t | 75,011 t | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 315,703 t | 261,827 t | 53,877 t | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 596,223 t | 261,561 t | 334,662 t | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 643,117 t | 231,239 t | 411,878 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Paraguay or Viet Nam?
- Paraguay, at 682,008 t against 228,001 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Paraguay and Viet Nam?
- 454,007 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Paraguay and Viet Nam rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Paraguay ranks 8th and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).