Peru vs Serbia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 30,418 t against 29,491 t in Peru, a difference of 927 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 69th of 191 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26,171 t | 21,485 t | 4,686 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 28,683 t | 26,326 t | 2,357 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 29,441 t | 30,726 t | 1,284 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 30,418 t against 29,491 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Peru and Serbia?
- 927 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Peru ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 69th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).