Poland vs Togo: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Poland
- Togo
How they compare
Poland currently reports 61,705 t against 51,591 t in Togo, a difference of 10,114 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 54th and Togo ranks 57th of 191 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33,043 t | 5,063 t | 27,980 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 21,055 t | 4,066 t | 16,989 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 28,214 t | 6,684 t | 21,530 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 23,589 t | 8,674 t | 14,914 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 15,028 t | 9,374 t | 5,654 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 36,127 t | 22,157 t | 13,970 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 55,934 t | 44,884 t | 11,050 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Poland or Togo?
- Poland, at 61,705 t against 51,591 t in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Poland and Togo?
- 10,114 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Togo rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Poland ranks 54th and Togo ranks 57th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).