Romania vs South Sudan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Romania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Romania currently reports 28,126 t against 24,051 t in South Sudan, a difference of 4,075 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Romania ranks 65th and South Sudan ranks 68th of 176 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23,795 t | 15,446 t | 8,349 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 27,209 t | 23,415 t | 3,794 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Romania or South Sudan?
- Romania, at 28,126 t against 24,051 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Romania and South Sudan?
- 4,075 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Romania and South Sudan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Romania ranks 65th and South Sudan ranks 68th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).