Serbia vs Sri Lanka: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Serbia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 32,421 t against 30,418 t in Serbia, a difference of 2,003 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Serbia ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 61st of 176 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,485 t | 25,323 t | 3,838 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 26,326 t | 29,058 t | 2,732 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 30,726 t | 31,304 t | 578.6 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Serbia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 32,421 t against 30,418 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 2,003 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sri Lanka?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Sri Lanka rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Serbia ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 61st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).