South Africa vs Sudan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 232,963 t against 210,680 t in South Africa, a difference of 22,283 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 19th of 176 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 99,924 t | 207,514 t | 107,590 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 163,657 t | 280,598 t | 116,940 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, South Africa or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 232,963 t against 210,680 t in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between South Africa and Sudan?
- 22,283 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- South Africa ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 19th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).