Sudan vs Viet Nam: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sudan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 232,963 t against 228,001 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 4,962 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Sudan ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 207,514 t | 259,179 t | 51,665 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 280,598 t | 231,239 t | 49,359 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Sudan or Viet Nam?
- Sudan, at 232,963 t against 228,001 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Sudan and Viet Nam?
- 4,962 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Viet Nam?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Viet Nam rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Sudan ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).