Dominican Republic vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture

Dominican Republic
0.2366 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Latvia
0.2031 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
50th
Latvia rank
53rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Latvia
0.050.10.150.20.25197019972024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.2366 Mt CO2e against 0.2031 Mt CO2e in Latvia, a difference of 0.0335 Mt CO2e.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 50th and Latvia ranks 53rd of 109 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Latvia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1159 Mt CO2e 0.065 Mt CO2e 0.0509 Mt CO2e Dominican Republic
1980s 0.1162 Mt CO2e 0.084 Mt CO2e 0.0322 Mt CO2e Dominican Republic
1990s 0.152 Mt CO2e 0.056 Mt CO2e 0.096 Mt CO2e Dominican Republic
2000s 0.1567 Mt CO2e 0.0854 Mt CO2e 0.0713 Mt CO2e Dominican Republic
2010s 0.1733 Mt CO2e 0.1608 Mt CO2e 0.0125 Mt CO2e Dominican Republic
2020s 0.2139 Mt CO2e 0.2066 Mt CO2e 0.0073 Mt CO2e Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture, Dominican Republic or Latvia?
Dominican Republic, at 0.2366 Mt CO2e against 0.2031 Mt CO2e in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture between Dominican Republic and Latvia?
0.0335 Mt CO2e, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Latvia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Latvia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture?
Dominican Republic ranks 50th and Latvia ranks 53rd of 109 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/dominican-republic/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/dominican-republic/latvia/">Dominican Republic vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
155 places, 8,525 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.2 Liming, 3.C.3 Urea application, 3.C.4 Direct N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.5 Indirect N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.6 Indirect N2O Emissions from manure management, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).