Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land

Belarus
2.56 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
-86.72 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Belarus rank
24th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
25th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land over time

  • Belarus
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
-100-50050200020112023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 2.56 Mt CO2e against -86.72 Mt CO2e in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 89.28 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Belarus ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 182 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s -1.22 Mt CO2e 51.21 Mt CO2e 52.43 Mt CO2e Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s -1.86 Mt CO2e 48.06 Mt CO2e 49.92 Mt CO2e Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 1.12 Mt CO2e -70.3 Mt CO2e 71.42 Mt CO2e Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land, Belarus or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Belarus, at 2.56 Mt CO2e against -86.72 Mt CO2e in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land between Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
89.28 Mt CO2e, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land?
Belarus ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-other-land-mt-co2e/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-other-land-mt-co2e/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/">Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
229 places, 5,300 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Other land".