Ecuador vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land
Ecuador
6.21 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Sweden
11.51 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Ecuador rank
14th
Sweden rank
11th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 11.51 Mt CO2e against 6.21 Mt CO2e in Ecuador, a difference of 5.3 Mt CO2e.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.9 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Ecuador ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 11th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.81 Mt CO2e | 9.99 Mt CO2e | 3.18 Mt CO2e | Sweden |
| 2010s | 11.33 Mt CO2e | 9.32 Mt CO2e | 2.01 Mt CO2e | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 6.06 Mt CO2e | 10.64 Mt CO2e | 4.57 Mt CO2e | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land, Ecuador or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 11.51 Mt CO2e against 6.21 Mt CO2e in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 5.3 Mt CO2e, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land?
- Ecuador ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 11th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Other land".