France vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land
France
5.23 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
5.15 Mt CO2e
in 2023
France rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
16th
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land over time
- France
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
France currently reports 5.23 Mt CO2e against 5.15 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.08 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was France ahead.
France ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, France averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.16 Mt CO2e | 5.15 Mt CO2e | 0.0127 Mt CO2e | France |
| 2010s | 5.39 Mt CO2e | 5.15 Mt CO2e | 0.2363 Mt CO2e | France |
| 2020s | 3.69 Mt CO2e | 5.15 Mt CO2e | 1.46 Mt CO2e | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land, France or Zimbabwe?
- France, at 5.23 Mt CO2e against 5.15 Mt CO2e in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land between France and Zimbabwe?
- 0.08 Mt CO2e, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do France and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - other land?
- France ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the category "Other land".