Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Afghanistan
10.55 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Zimbabwe
15.24 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
29th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Zimbabwe
2.557.51012.515200020112023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 15.24 Mt CO2e against 10.55 Mt CO2e in Afghanistan, a difference of 4.69 Mt CO2e.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 10.55 Mt CO2e 8.46 Mt CO2e 2.09 Mt CO2e Afghanistan
2010s 10.55 Mt CO2e 15.24 Mt CO2e 4.7 Mt CO2e Zimbabwe
2020s 10.55 Mt CO2e 15.24 Mt CO2e 4.7 Mt CO2e Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Afghanistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 15.24 Mt CO2e against 10.55 Mt CO2e in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
4.69 Mt CO2e, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Afghanistan ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/afghanistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/afghanistan/zimbabwe/">Afghanistan vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.