Angola vs Least developed countries: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Angola
70.41 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Least developed countries
146.69 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Angola rank
7th
Least developed countries rank
7th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Angola
  • Least developed countries
0200400600800200020112023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 146.69 Mt CO2e against 70.41 Mt CO2e in Angola, a difference of 76.28 Mt CO2e.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 2.1 times Angola's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 7th of 183 countries.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 40.07 Mt CO2e 189.97 Mt CO2e 149.9 Mt CO2e Least developed countries
2010s 67.4 Mt CO2e 350.04 Mt CO2e 282.64 Mt CO2e Least developed countries
2020s 70.41 Mt CO2e 148.73 Mt CO2e 78.32 Mt CO2e Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Angola or Least developed countries?
Least developed countries, at 146.69 Mt CO2e against 70.41 Mt CO2e in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Angola and Least developed countries?
76.28 Mt CO2e, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Least developed countries?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Angola and Least developed countries rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Angola ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 7th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Least developed countries: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/angola/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/angola/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Angola vs Least developed countries: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.