Australia vs Namibia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Australia
-95.82 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Namibia
-110.71 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Australia rank
171st
Namibia rank
173rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Australia
  • Namibia
-100-50050100200020112023

How they compare

Australia currently reports -95.82 Mt CO2e against -110.71 Mt CO2e in Namibia, a difference of 14.89 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 171st and Namibia ranks 173rd of 183 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 48.65 Mt CO2e -100.3 Mt CO2e 148.96 Mt CO2e Australia
2010s -32.52 Mt CO2e -107.63 Mt CO2e 75.11 Mt CO2e Australia
2020s -97.27 Mt CO2e -109.4 Mt CO2e 12.13 Mt CO2e Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Australia or Namibia?
Australia, at -95.82 Mt CO2e against -110.71 Mt CO2e in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Australia and Namibia?
14.89 Mt CO2e, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Namibia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and Namibia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Australia ranks 171st and Namibia ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Namibia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/australia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/australia/namibia/">Australia vs Namibia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.