Barbados vs Cape Verde: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Barbados
-0.059 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Cape Verde
-0.059 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Barbados rank
69th
Cape Verde rank
69th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Barbados
  • Cape Verde
-0.06-0.05-0.04-0.03200020112023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports -0.059 Mt CO2e against -0.059 Mt CO2e in Cape Verde, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 69th and Cape Verde ranks 69th of 183 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Cape Verde Difference Ahead
2000s -0.0528 Mt CO2e -0.041 Mt CO2e 0.0118 Mt CO2e Cape Verde
2010s -0.059 Mt CO2e -0.0458 Mt CO2e 0.0132 Mt CO2e Cape Verde
2020s -0.059 Mt CO2e -0.059 Mt CO2e 0 Mt CO2e

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Barbados or Cape Verde?
Barbados, at -0.059 Mt CO2e against -0.059 Mt CO2e in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Barbados and Cape Verde?
0 Mt CO2e, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cape Verde?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Cape Verde rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Barbados ranks 69th and Cape Verde ranks 69th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Cape Verde: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/barbados/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/barbados/cabo-verde/">Barbados vs Cape Verde: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.