Botswana vs Costa Rica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Botswana
-2.82 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Costa Rica
-3.07 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Botswana rank
106th
Costa Rica rank
107th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Botswana
  • Costa Rica
-505101520200020112023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports -2.82 Mt CO2e against -3.07 Mt CO2e in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.25 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Botswana ranks 106th and Costa Rica ranks 107th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Costa Rica Difference Ahead
2000s -2.82 Mt CO2e 8.69 Mt CO2e 11.51 Mt CO2e Costa Rica
2010s -2.82 Mt CO2e 0.3731 Mt CO2e 3.19 Mt CO2e Costa Rica
2020s -2.82 Mt CO2e -3.07 Mt CO2e 0.2523 Mt CO2e Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Botswana or Costa Rica?
Botswana, at -2.82 Mt CO2e against -3.07 Mt CO2e in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Botswana and Costa Rica?
0.25 Mt CO2e, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Costa Rica?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Costa Rica rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Botswana ranks 106th and Costa Rica ranks 107th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Costa Rica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/botswana/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/botswana/costa-rica/">Botswana vs Costa Rica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.