Botswana vs Czechia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Botswana
-2.82 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Czechia
-3.58 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Botswana rank
106th
Czechia rank
109th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Botswana
  • Czechia
-10-505200020112023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports -2.82 Mt CO2e against -3.58 Mt CO2e in Czechia, a difference of 0.76 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 106th and Czechia ranks 109th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s -2.82 Mt CO2e -9.5 Mt CO2e 6.68 Mt CO2e Botswana
2010s -2.82 Mt CO2e -6.28 Mt CO2e 3.46 Mt CO2e Botswana
2020s -2.82 Mt CO2e 2.42 Mt CO2e 5.24 Mt CO2e Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Botswana or Czechia?
Botswana, at -2.82 Mt CO2e against -3.58 Mt CO2e in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Botswana and Czechia?
0.76 Mt CO2e, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Czechia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Czechia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Botswana ranks 106th and Czechia ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Czechia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/botswana/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/botswana/czechia/">Botswana vs Czechia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.