Central African Republic vs Malaysia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Central African Republic
-160.37 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Malaysia
-223 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
176th
Malaysia rank
178th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Malaysia
-240-220-200-180-160200020112023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -160.37 Mt CO2e against -223 Mt CO2e in Malaysia, a difference of 62.63 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 176th and Malaysia ranks 178th of 183 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Malaysia Difference Ahead
2000s -168.99 Mt CO2e -218.81 Mt CO2e 49.82 Mt CO2e Central African Republic
2010s -165.56 Mt CO2e -220.76 Mt CO2e 55.2 Mt CO2e Central African Republic
2020s -160.37 Mt CO2e -229.22 Mt CO2e 68.85 Mt CO2e Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Central African Republic or Malaysia?
Central African Republic, at -160.37 Mt CO2e against -223 Mt CO2e in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Central African Republic and Malaysia?
62.63 Mt CO2e, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Malaysia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Malaysia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Central African Republic ranks 176th and Malaysia ranks 178th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Malaysia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/central-african-republic/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/central-african-republic/malaysia/">Central African Republic vs Malaysia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.