What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Central Europe and the Baltics and Guatemala?

151.05 Mt CO2e, with Guatemala ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Guatemala?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guatemala: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Central Europe and the Baltics

-120.16 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Guatemala

30.89 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Central Europe and the Baltics rank

21st

Guatemala rank

21st

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

Central Europe and the Baltics
Guatemala

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 30.89 Mt CO2e against -120.16 Mt CO2e in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 151.05 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 21st of 47 groups.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Central Europe and the Baltics	Guatemala	Difference	Ahead
2000s	-144.1 Mt CO2e	30.89 Mt CO2e	174.98 Mt CO2e	Guatemala
2010s	-130.45 Mt CO2e	31 Mt CO2e	161.45 Mt CO2e	Guatemala
2020s	-113.74 Mt CO2e	33.82 Mt CO2e	147.57 Mt CO2e	Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Central Europe and the Baltics or Guatemala?: Guatemala, at 30.89 Mt CO2e against -120.16 Mt CO2e in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Central Europe and the Baltics and Guatemala?: 151.05 Mt CO2e, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Guatemala?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Guatemala rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?: Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 21st and Guatemala ranks 21st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guatemala: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guatemala/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guatemala: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit: Mt CO2e
Source: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.