How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Congo vs Nepal: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Congo

-18.25 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Nepal

-16.23 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Congo rank

147th

Nepal rank

144th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

Congo
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports -16.23 Mt CO2e against -18.25 Mt CO2e in Congo, a difference of 2.02 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 147th and Nepal ranks 144th of 183 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
2000s	-17.03 Mt CO2e	-16.23 Mt CO2e	0.8014 Mt CO2e	Nepal
2010s	-24.77 Mt CO2e	-16.23 Mt CO2e	8.53 Mt CO2e	Nepal
2020s	-17.51 Mt CO2e	-16.23 Mt CO2e	1.28 Mt CO2e	Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Congo or Nepal?: Nepal, at -16.23 Mt CO2e against -18.25 Mt CO2e in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Congo and Nepal?: 2.02 Mt CO2e, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nepal?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Congo and Nepal rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?: Congo ranks 147th and Nepal ranks 144th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nepal: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/congo-rep/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/congo-rep/nepal/">Congo vs Nepal: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit: Mt CO2e
Source: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.