Cuba vs New Zealand: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Cuba
-27.77 Mt CO2e
in 2023
New Zealand
-20.51 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Cuba rank
152nd
New Zealand rank
150th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Cuba
  • New Zealand
-30-27.5-25-22.5-20-17.5200020112023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports -20.51 Mt CO2e against -27.77 Mt CO2e in Cuba, a difference of 7.26 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 150th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s -19.69 Mt CO2e -26.27 Mt CO2e 6.58 Mt CO2e Cuba
2010s -25.72 Mt CO2e -25.58 Mt CO2e 0.1361 Mt CO2e New Zealand
2020s -28.12 Mt CO2e -20.6 Mt CO2e 7.51 Mt CO2e New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Cuba or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at -20.51 Mt CO2e against -27.77 Mt CO2e in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Cuba and New Zealand?
7.26 Mt CO2e, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Cuba ranks 152nd and New Zealand ranks 150th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Zealand: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/cuba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/cuba/new-zealand/">Cuba vs New Zealand: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.