What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Early-demographic dividend and Zimbabwe?

584.88 Mt CO2e, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Zimbabwe?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Early-demographic dividend vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Early-demographic dividend

-569.64 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Zimbabwe

15.24 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Early-demographic dividend rank

31st

Zimbabwe rank

29th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

Early-demographic dividend
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 15.24 Mt CO2e against -569.64 Mt CO2e in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 584.88 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 47 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Early-demographic dividend	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	37.41 Mt CO2e	8.46 Mt CO2e	28.95 Mt CO2e	Early-demographic dividend
2010s	117.63 Mt CO2e	15.24 Mt CO2e	102.39 Mt CO2e	Early-demographic dividend
2020s	-518.02 Mt CO2e	15.24 Mt CO2e	533.27 Mt CO2e	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Early-demographic dividend or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 15.24 Mt CO2e against -569.64 Mt CO2e in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Early-demographic dividend and Zimbabwe?: 584.88 Mt CO2e, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Zimbabwe?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?: Early-demographic dividend ranks 31st and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/early-demographic-dividend/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/early-demographic-dividend/zimbabwe/">Early-demographic dividend vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit: Mt CO2e
Source: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.