East Asia & Pacific vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

East Asia & Pacific
-1,534 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Latvia
3.23 Mt CO2e
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
40th
Latvia rank
43rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Latvia
-1.5k-1.0k-5000200020112023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 3.23 Mt CO2e against -1,534 Mt CO2e in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 1,537 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 43rd of 47 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s -558.37 Mt CO2e -9.69 Mt CO2e 548.69 Mt CO2e Latvia
2010s -766.74 Mt CO2e -2.84 Mt CO2e 763.91 Mt CO2e Latvia
2020s -1,525 Mt CO2e 1.78 Mt CO2e 1,526 Mt CO2e Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, East Asia & Pacific or Latvia?
Latvia, at 3.23 Mt CO2e against -1,534 Mt CO2e in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between East Asia & Pacific and Latvia?
1,537 Mt CO2e, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Latvia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Latvia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 43rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/east-asia-and-pacific/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/east-asia-and-pacific/latvia/">East Asia & Pacific vs Latvia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.