How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Small states?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Ecuador vs Small states: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Ecuador

25.8 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Small states

-191.85 Mt CO2e

in 2023

Ecuador rank

25th

Small states rank

25th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

Ecuador
Small states

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 25.8 Mt CO2e against -191.85 Mt CO2e in Small states, a difference of 217.65 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 25th and Small states ranks 25th of 183 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Small states	Difference	Ahead
2000s	40.12 Mt CO2e	-197.25 Mt CO2e	237.37 Mt CO2e	Ecuador
2010s	28.66 Mt CO2e	-192.2 Mt CO2e	220.86 Mt CO2e	Ecuador
2020s	24.12 Mt CO2e	-192.4 Mt CO2e	216.51 Mt CO2e	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Ecuador or Small states?: Ecuador, at 25.8 Mt CO2e against -191.85 Mt CO2e in Small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Ecuador and Small states?: 217.65 Mt CO2e, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Small states?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Small states rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?: Ecuador ranks 25th and Small states ranks 25th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Small states: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/ecuador/small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/ecuador/small-states/">Ecuador vs Small states: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit: Mt CO2e
Source: Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.