Europe & Central Asia vs Netherlands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding

Europe & Central Asia
-1,598 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Netherlands
3.11 Mt CO2e
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
42nd
Netherlands rank
44th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Netherlands
-2.0k-1.5k-1.0k-5000200020112023

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 3.11 Mt CO2e against -1,598 Mt CO2e in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 1,601 Mt CO2e.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 42nd and Netherlands ranks 44th of 47 groups.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s -2,097 Mt CO2e 4.09 Mt CO2e 2,101 Mt CO2e Netherlands
2010s -1,687 Mt CO2e 3.83 Mt CO2e 1,691 Mt CO2e Netherlands
2020s -1,455 Mt CO2e 2.8 Mt CO2e 1,458 Mt CO2e Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding, Europe & Central Asia or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 3.11 Mt CO2e against -1,598 Mt CO2e in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding between Europe & Central Asia and Netherlands?
1,601 Mt CO2e, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Netherlands?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Netherlands rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) net fluxes from lulucf - total excluding?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 42nd and Netherlands ranks 44th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Netherlands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding. Statizoid, drawing on Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/europe-and-central-asia/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-net-fluxes-from-lulucf-total-excluding-non-tropical-fires-mt-co2e/europe-and-central-asia/netherlands/">Europe & Central Asia vs Netherlands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity on countries’ reporting
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
230 places, 5,520 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Net flux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry LULUCF, excluding non-tropical fires at the country level.